http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rnm7YOZslII...feature=channel
Citation
Le Brésil confronté à la pire catastrophe naturelle en 40 ans
LEMONDE.FR avec AFP et Reuters | 14.01.11 | 06h42 • Mis à jour le 14.01.11 | 10h52

Vue des dévastations dans le village de Vieira, à 40 kilomètres de Teresopolis.AFP/VANDERLEI ALMEIDA
La région montagneuse près de Rio, dévastée par des pluies qui ont déjà fait plus de 500 morts, attend avec anxiété de fortes précipitations pour vendredi 14 janvier alors qu'elle fait face à la pire catastrophe naturelle de l'histoire du pays.
Selon un décompte fait par le site G1 du groupe de presse Globo, les inondations et éboulements de terrain provoqués par les pluies torrentielles, dans la nuit de mardi à mercredi, ont fait 506 morts. Le site UOL, pour sa part, a cité le chiffre de 501 morts. D'après G1, citant les municipalités concernées, on a dénombré 225 morts à Nova Friburgo, 223 à Teresopolis, 39 à Petropolis et 19 à Sumidouro.
Les médias ont souligné que cette tragédie était "la plus grande catastrophe naturelle de l'histoire du pays". Elle dépasse en effet les glissements de terrain de 1967 à Caraguatatuba, sur le littoral nord de Sao Paulo, donnés jusqu'à maintenant comme la catastrophe la plus meurtrière, avec 436 morts.
La plupart des personnes qui ont trouvé la mort ont été surprises dans leur sommeil par des torrents de boue qui ont tout emporté sur leur passage, arbres, maisons, voitures.

Un homme récupère des affaires dans une maison qui n'a pas été emportée par les flots, dans le village de Vieira.AFP/VANDERLEI ALMEIDA
Confrontée à sa première crise depuis son arrivée à la tête du pays le 1er janvier, la présidente Dilma Rousseff a survolé la région et s'est rendue à Nova Friburgo. Elle a jugé que la nature n'était pas seule en cause dans cette catastrophe, qui, dans cette ville, a surtout touché des logements de fortune installés au pied des collines. "Se loger dans des zones à risque est la règle plutôt que l'exception au Brésil", a dit Dilma Rousseff. "Quand il n'y a pas de politique du logement, où vont vivre les gens qui ne gagnent pas plus que deux fois le salaire minimum ?" a-t-elle interrogé. Le gouvernement a déjà débloqué 780 millions de reals (350 millions d'euros) pour les sinistrés.

La présidente Dilma Rousseff a survolé la région et s'est rendue dans la ville de Nova Friburgo, où au moins 200 personnes sont mortes.AFP/ROBERTO STUCKERT FILHO
Chaque heure depuis deux jours, des centaines de sauveteurs découvrent de nouvelles victimes sous les torrents de boue qui ont ravagé cette région connue pour la douceur de son climat, refuge préféré des habitants de Rio fuyant la chaleur de l'été austral.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZaEqA85U7yY...player_embedded
Au milieu des scènes de deuil et de désespoir de familles décimées, quelques "miracles" ont aussi eu lieu, comme pour cette femme de 53 ans, sauvée in extremis des eaux en furie par un mince filin jeté par des voisins, une scène passant en boucle sur les télévisions. Ou comme ce bébé de six mois, sorti indemne par les pompiers après être resté quinze heures enseveli sous la boue, blotti dans les bras de son père.
Les experts expliquent l'ampleur du drame par la conjonction de rares phénomènes naturels et de l'urbanisation sauvage. Résidences secondaires, auberges et hôtels des quartiers aisés ont autant souffert que les habitations précaires des quartiers pauvres occupant illégalement des zones à risque.
LEMONDE.FR avec AFP et Reuters | 14.01.11 | 06h42 • Mis à jour le 14.01.11 | 10h52

Vue des dévastations dans le village de Vieira, à 40 kilomètres de Teresopolis.AFP/VANDERLEI ALMEIDA
La région montagneuse près de Rio, dévastée par des pluies qui ont déjà fait plus de 500 morts, attend avec anxiété de fortes précipitations pour vendredi 14 janvier alors qu'elle fait face à la pire catastrophe naturelle de l'histoire du pays.
Selon un décompte fait par le site G1 du groupe de presse Globo, les inondations et éboulements de terrain provoqués par les pluies torrentielles, dans la nuit de mardi à mercredi, ont fait 506 morts. Le site UOL, pour sa part, a cité le chiffre de 501 morts. D'après G1, citant les municipalités concernées, on a dénombré 225 morts à Nova Friburgo, 223 à Teresopolis, 39 à Petropolis et 19 à Sumidouro.
Les médias ont souligné que cette tragédie était "la plus grande catastrophe naturelle de l'histoire du pays". Elle dépasse en effet les glissements de terrain de 1967 à Caraguatatuba, sur le littoral nord de Sao Paulo, donnés jusqu'à maintenant comme la catastrophe la plus meurtrière, avec 436 morts.
La plupart des personnes qui ont trouvé la mort ont été surprises dans leur sommeil par des torrents de boue qui ont tout emporté sur leur passage, arbres, maisons, voitures.

Un homme récupère des affaires dans une maison qui n'a pas été emportée par les flots, dans le village de Vieira.AFP/VANDERLEI ALMEIDA
Confrontée à sa première crise depuis son arrivée à la tête du pays le 1er janvier, la présidente Dilma Rousseff a survolé la région et s'est rendue à Nova Friburgo. Elle a jugé que la nature n'était pas seule en cause dans cette catastrophe, qui, dans cette ville, a surtout touché des logements de fortune installés au pied des collines. "Se loger dans des zones à risque est la règle plutôt que l'exception au Brésil", a dit Dilma Rousseff. "Quand il n'y a pas de politique du logement, où vont vivre les gens qui ne gagnent pas plus que deux fois le salaire minimum ?" a-t-elle interrogé. Le gouvernement a déjà débloqué 780 millions de reals (350 millions d'euros) pour les sinistrés.

La présidente Dilma Rousseff a survolé la région et s'est rendue dans la ville de Nova Friburgo, où au moins 200 personnes sont mortes.AFP/ROBERTO STUCKERT FILHO
Chaque heure depuis deux jours, des centaines de sauveteurs découvrent de nouvelles victimes sous les torrents de boue qui ont ravagé cette région connue pour la douceur de son climat, refuge préféré des habitants de Rio fuyant la chaleur de l'été austral.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZaEqA85U7yY...player_embedded
Au milieu des scènes de deuil et de désespoir de familles décimées, quelques "miracles" ont aussi eu lieu, comme pour cette femme de 53 ans, sauvée in extremis des eaux en furie par un mince filin jeté par des voisins, une scène passant en boucle sur les télévisions. Ou comme ce bébé de six mois, sorti indemne par les pompiers après être resté quinze heures enseveli sous la boue, blotti dans les bras de son père.
Les experts expliquent l'ampleur du drame par la conjonction de rares phénomènes naturels et de l'urbanisation sauvage. Résidences secondaires, auberges et hôtels des quartiers aisés ont autant souffert que les habitations précaires des quartiers pauvres occupant illégalement des zones à risque.
Citation
Torrential rains inundated a heavily populated, steep-sloped area about 40 miles north of Rio de Janeiro on Tuesday and Wednesday, triggering flash floods and mudslides that have claimed at least 511 lives. Rainfall amounts of approximately 300 mm (12 inches) fell in just a few hours in the hardest-hit regions, Teresopolis and Nova Friburgo. Many more people are missing, and the death toll is expected to go much higher once rescuers reach remote villages that have been cut off from communications. The death toll makes the January 2011 floods Brazil's worst single-day natural disaster in its history. Brazil suffers hundreds of deaths each year due to flooding and mudslides, but the past 12 months have been particularly devastating. Flooding and landslides near Rio in April last year killed 246 people and did about $13 billion in damage, and at least 85 people perished last January during a similar event.
Figure 1. Flooding at Sao Jose do Vale do Vale do Rio Preto in Brazil, photographed on Thursday, January 13, 2011.
Role of near-record sea surface temperatures in Brazil's flood
This week's heavy rains occurred when a storm system crossing from west to east over southern Brazil drew in a moist southerly flow air off the Atlantic Ocean over southern Brazil. Sea surface temperatures along the Brazilian coast are at near-record warm levels, which likely contributed to the heavy rains. Record rains are more likely when sea surface temperatures over the nearby moisture source regions are at record high levels. This occurs because increased amounts of water vapor evaporate into the atmosphere from a warm ocean compared to a cold one, due to the extra motion and energy of the hotter water molecules. According to an analysis I did of the UK Met Office Hadley Centre sea surface temperature data set, December 2010 sea surface temperatures in the 5x5 degree region of Earth's surface along the Brazilian shore nearest the disaster area, 20S to 25S and 45W to 40W, were the second warmest on record since 1900. Temperatures were 1.05°C (1.9°F) above average in this region last month. Only 2007, with a 1.21°C departure from average, had warmer December ocean temperatures.
Meteorologist Eugenio Hackbart, with the Brazilian private weather forecasting company Metsul, wrote in his blog today, "Heavy rains early this year coincide with the strong warming of the Atlantic along the coasts of southern and southeastern Brazil. With waters up to 2°C warmer than average in some places, there is a major release of moisture in the atmosphere essential for the formation of storms."

Figure 2. Newspaper front page story in Brazil after the March 18, 1967 flooding disaster, Brazil's previous deadliest single-day natural disaster. Image credit:Metsul.
Brazil's previous worst natural disaster: the March 18, 1967 flood
The previous worst natural disaster in Brazilian history occurred on March 18, 1967 when a tsunami-like flood of water, mud and rocks swept down a hillside in the coastal city of Caraguatatuba, near Sao Paulo, killing 300 - 500 people. According to meteorologist Eugenio Hackbart with the private Brazilian weather company Metsul, a rainguage at nearby Sao Sebastao measured 115 mm (4.5") on March 17, and 420 mm (17") on March 18. Hackbart puts the death toll from the 1967 disaster at 300 - 500, and refers to it as Brazil's deadliest single-day natural disaster in history. Heavy rains at other locations in Brazil that month caused additional mudslides and flooding deaths, and Wikipedia lists the total death toll for the Brazil March 1967 floods at 785.
I looked at the sea surface temperatures for March 1967 to see if unusually warm ocean waters may have contributed to that year's flooding disaster. Sea surface temperatures in the 5x5 degree region of Earth's surface nearest the disaster site (20S to 25S, 50W to 45W) were 0.24°C (0.4°F) above average, which is not significantly different from normal. So, we can get record rains and flooding when sea surface temperatures are near normal, and it is possible that this week's catastrophe was not significantly impacted by the exceptionally warm water near the coast. However, heating up the oceans loads the dice in favor of extreme rainfall events, and makes it more likely we will have an unprecedented flood. If we look at the departure of temperature from average for the moisture source regions of the globe's four most extreme flooding disasters over the past 12 months, we find that these ocean temperatures ranked 2nd or 3rd warmest, going back through 111 years of history:
January 2011 Brazilian floods: 2nd warmest SSTs on record, +1.05°C (20S to 25S, 45W to 40W)
November 2010 Colombia floods: 3rd warmest SSTs on record, +0.65°C (10N to 0N, 80W to 75W)
December 2010 Australian floods: 3rd warmest SSTs on record, +1.05°C (10S to 25S, 145E to 155E)
July 2010 Pakistani floods: 2nd warmest SSTs on record, +0.95°C (Bay of Bengal, 10N to 20N, 80E to 95E)
The size of the ocean source region appropriate to use for these calculations is uncertain, and these rankings will move up or down by averaging in a larger or smaller region of ocean. For example, if one includes an adjacent 5x5 degree area of ocean next to Brazil's coast that may have also contributed moisture to this week's floods, the SSTs rank as 7th warmest in the past 111 years, instead of 2nd warmest. It would take detailed modeling studies to determine just how much impact these near-record sea surface temperatures had on the heavy rains that occurred, and what portion of the ocean served as the moisture source region.

Figure 3. Predicted total precipitation amounts in South America for the 7-day period ending at 7am EST January 21, 2011, as forecast by the 06Z run of the GFS Ensemble model made January 14, 2011. Image credit: Florida State University.
More rain in the forecast
The coast of Brazil is embedded in a warm, moist tropical airmass that is expected to continue to bring heavy rains over he Rio de Janeiro area for at least the next week. Heavy rains in excess of five inches in the next seven days (Figure 3) are predicted by the GFS Ensemble computer model for the disaster region, just north of Rio de Janeiro. The additional heavy rains are likely to cause more life-threatening mudslides and floods.
Figure 1. Flooding at Sao Jose do Vale do Vale do Rio Preto in Brazil, photographed on Thursday, January 13, 2011.
Role of near-record sea surface temperatures in Brazil's flood
This week's heavy rains occurred when a storm system crossing from west to east over southern Brazil drew in a moist southerly flow air off the Atlantic Ocean over southern Brazil. Sea surface temperatures along the Brazilian coast are at near-record warm levels, which likely contributed to the heavy rains. Record rains are more likely when sea surface temperatures over the nearby moisture source regions are at record high levels. This occurs because increased amounts of water vapor evaporate into the atmosphere from a warm ocean compared to a cold one, due to the extra motion and energy of the hotter water molecules. According to an analysis I did of the UK Met Office Hadley Centre sea surface temperature data set, December 2010 sea surface temperatures in the 5x5 degree region of Earth's surface along the Brazilian shore nearest the disaster area, 20S to 25S and 45W to 40W, were the second warmest on record since 1900. Temperatures were 1.05°C (1.9°F) above average in this region last month. Only 2007, with a 1.21°C departure from average, had warmer December ocean temperatures.
Meteorologist Eugenio Hackbart, with the Brazilian private weather forecasting company Metsul, wrote in his blog today, "Heavy rains early this year coincide with the strong warming of the Atlantic along the coasts of southern and southeastern Brazil. With waters up to 2°C warmer than average in some places, there is a major release of moisture in the atmosphere essential for the formation of storms."

Figure 2. Newspaper front page story in Brazil after the March 18, 1967 flooding disaster, Brazil's previous deadliest single-day natural disaster. Image credit:Metsul.
Brazil's previous worst natural disaster: the March 18, 1967 flood
The previous worst natural disaster in Brazilian history occurred on March 18, 1967 when a tsunami-like flood of water, mud and rocks swept down a hillside in the coastal city of Caraguatatuba, near Sao Paulo, killing 300 - 500 people. According to meteorologist Eugenio Hackbart with the private Brazilian weather company Metsul, a rainguage at nearby Sao Sebastao measured 115 mm (4.5") on March 17, and 420 mm (17") on March 18. Hackbart puts the death toll from the 1967 disaster at 300 - 500, and refers to it as Brazil's deadliest single-day natural disaster in history. Heavy rains at other locations in Brazil that month caused additional mudslides and flooding deaths, and Wikipedia lists the total death toll for the Brazil March 1967 floods at 785.
I looked at the sea surface temperatures for March 1967 to see if unusually warm ocean waters may have contributed to that year's flooding disaster. Sea surface temperatures in the 5x5 degree region of Earth's surface nearest the disaster site (20S to 25S, 50W to 45W) were 0.24°C (0.4°F) above average, which is not significantly different from normal. So, we can get record rains and flooding when sea surface temperatures are near normal, and it is possible that this week's catastrophe was not significantly impacted by the exceptionally warm water near the coast. However, heating up the oceans loads the dice in favor of extreme rainfall events, and makes it more likely we will have an unprecedented flood. If we look at the departure of temperature from average for the moisture source regions of the globe's four most extreme flooding disasters over the past 12 months, we find that these ocean temperatures ranked 2nd or 3rd warmest, going back through 111 years of history:
January 2011 Brazilian floods: 2nd warmest SSTs on record, +1.05°C (20S to 25S, 45W to 40W)
November 2010 Colombia floods: 3rd warmest SSTs on record, +0.65°C (10N to 0N, 80W to 75W)
December 2010 Australian floods: 3rd warmest SSTs on record, +1.05°C (10S to 25S, 145E to 155E)
July 2010 Pakistani floods: 2nd warmest SSTs on record, +0.95°C (Bay of Bengal, 10N to 20N, 80E to 95E)
The size of the ocean source region appropriate to use for these calculations is uncertain, and these rankings will move up or down by averaging in a larger or smaller region of ocean. For example, if one includes an adjacent 5x5 degree area of ocean next to Brazil's coast that may have also contributed moisture to this week's floods, the SSTs rank as 7th warmest in the past 111 years, instead of 2nd warmest. It would take detailed modeling studies to determine just how much impact these near-record sea surface temperatures had on the heavy rains that occurred, and what portion of the ocean served as the moisture source region.

Figure 3. Predicted total precipitation amounts in South America for the 7-day period ending at 7am EST January 21, 2011, as forecast by the 06Z run of the GFS Ensemble model made January 14, 2011. Image credit: Florida State University.
More rain in the forecast
The coast of Brazil is embedded in a warm, moist tropical airmass that is expected to continue to bring heavy rains over he Rio de Janeiro area for at least the next week. Heavy rains in excess of five inches in the next seven days (Figure 3) are predicted by the GFS Ensemble computer model for the disaster region, just north of Rio de Janeiro. The additional heavy rains are likely to cause more life-threatening mudslides and floods.













































